Dir: Dave Robinson. UK, 1981. 87 mins.
There is an appealing contradiction at the heart of Take It or Leave It: a film about the spectacular rise of the English band Madness which is resolutely uninterested in behaving like a rock-star movie.
Released in October 1981, when Madness were already one of Britain’s most recognisable pop groups, Dave Robinson’s first feature looks backwards to the period before the fame, beginning in Camden in 1976 and following the succession of friendships, fallings-out, line-up changes, dead-end jobs and musical experiments that eventually produced the band.
The crucial decision is to make the members of Madness play themselves. Suggs, Mike Barson, Lee Thompson, Chris Foreman, Mark Bedford, Daniel Woodgate and Chas Smash are not asked to impersonate their younger selves through conventional dramatic performance. Instead, they reconstruct episodes from their own past, often with the awkwardness of people remembering something rather than actors performing it. The distinction gives the film its peculiar energy.
It also prevents Take It or Leave It from becoming a conventional rise-and-fall narrative. There is no tortured genius waiting to be discovered, no Svengali figure and no obligatory moment when success destroys the friendship. Robinson’s story is more prosaic and, consequently, more revealing: people form a band because they want to play music, discover that being in a band involves considerably more effort than anticipated, argue about who is doing what, acquire new members and gradually discover that the thing they are doing might actually become a career.
The chronology moves from the North London Invaders of 1976 through the adoption of the Madness name in 1979 and into the extraordinary acceleration of their career. By the time the film was made, One Step Beyond… had established the band’s distinctive ska-pop identity, while singles such as Baggy Trousers, Night Boat to Cairo and Embarrassment had turned their visual eccentricity into a national pop language.
What Robinson does, however, is to make that success feel almost incidental. The film is less interested in the mechanics of becoming famous than in the texture of not being famous: the rehearsals, jobs, girlfriends, pubs, arguments and humiliations. The band are allowed to remain a collection of individuals rather than being retrospectively moulded into a unified pop phenomenon.
That looseness comes directly from the method. Robinson interviewed the members about their favourite memories and built the film from those recollections; there was no conventional completed screenplay, while scenes were largely improvised. Editor Michael Ellis has described the film as something that was substantially discovered in the cutting room. It was shot on two 16mm cameras and subsequently blown up to 35mm.
The visual style consequently has a pleasantly homemade quality. It is not polished enough to conceal the process of reconstruction, and Robinson does not seem particularly concerned that the seams should disappear. Locations connected with the band’s real history are used to give the film a geographical authenticity, while the camera moves between dramatised scenes, performance material and the visual world that Madness had already established in their promotional films.
This is important because Madness were among the first British pop groups for whom the image was inseparable from the music. The loping choreography, exaggerated expressions, suits, hats and physical comedy were not decoration around the songs; they were part of the band’s identity. Robinson, who had already directed Madness videos including One Step Beyond and Baggy Trousers, understands this instinctively.
As a result, Take It or Leave It sometimes feels like an unusually long Madness video that has escaped into feature-film territory. The songs provide punctuation rather than simply functioning as soundtrack material. Musical performance becomes a way of advancing the narrative: the band gradually becomes more assured in front of an audience at precisely the same time that the film’s scale expands.
The performances themselves are deliberately uneven. Some of the band members possess an effortless screen presence; others look as though they would rather be somewhere else. But the lack of professional acting technique has an unexpected advantage. Their relationships feel less scripted because they are not attempting to manufacture conventional dramatic emotion. A pause, a glance or an apparently throwaway exchange can feel more truthful than a carefully written confrontation.
The weakness is that the film occasionally mistakes authenticity for drama. Episodes are presented because they happened, not necessarily because they develop the narrative. Characters appear and disappear according to the memories being reconstructed, and the chronology can feel episodic. The film has the shape of a scrapbook rather than a tightly constructed screenplay.
Yet that may be the most honest way of representing Madness. Their career was not the product of a single grand decision. It accumulated through accident, persistence and personality. The film’s episodic structure reproduces that sense of events happening before anyone fully understands their significance.
There is also something unusually self-aware about the timing. Take It or Leave It was made when Madness were still close enough to their origins to remember them vividly, but successful enough to look back at those origins from another world. The film therefore occupies an intriguing historical moment: the musicians are already pop stars, but the mythology has not yet hardened around them.
Its final movement towards the large-scale live performance makes the point without needing to spell it out. The small North London beginnings have become a mass audience. The transformation is visible rather than explained.
Robinson’s film is therefore most successful when it refuses to turn Madness into heroes. It presents them as opportunists in the best sense: young men sufficiently obsessed with making music to keep going through the periods when there was little reason to believe it would lead anywhere. Their eventual success is extraordinary precisely because the people involved seem, for much of the film, so ordinary.
There are things the film leaves unexplored, and its cheerfulness can sometimes become evasive. But its limitations are inseparable from its peculiar charm. This is not an authoritative history of Madness; it is a memory of Madness made by Madness at the moment when memory was becoming mythology.
More than four decades later, that gives Take It or Leave It its real value. It catches the band before nostalgia has had time to tidy up the past. The film is scruffy, funny, affectionate and occasionally clumsy — but those qualities make it a remarkably vivid record of a particular British pop moment.
Madness would go on to become considerably more than the seven young men reconstructed here. But Robinson’s film understands something that a more polished biopic might have lost: the unlikely part of their story is not that they became famous, but that they kept playing long enough for fame to find them.
TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT is released in cinemas in the UK & Ireland on 2 October 2026, with previews from 30 September, and on BFI Blu-ray/DVD Limited Edition on 19 October











Merce was also passionate about working with artists from other disciplines including composer John Cage, Cunningham’s longterm partner; the painter Robert Rauschenberg; and Andy Warhol whose collaboration is particularly striking in Merce’s 1968 Sci-fi themed dance work Rainforest which featured Warhol’s metallic helium-filled silver balloons (the Silver Clouds) that float around the dancers like something from outer space.








THE LAST WALTZ is deeply personal yet timeless in its universal appeal. Martin Scorsese’s love song to rock music is a resounding one, and arguably the best concert film of all time. Dated in its Seventies look, but endearingly so, the doc has been remastered onto bluray, and the result is stunning. The film showcases the legendary rock group The Band’s final farewell concert appearance. Joined on stage by more than a dozen special guests, Van Morrison, Eric Clapton, Neil Young and Joni Mitchell perform their iconic numbers to dazzling effect. The Last Waltz started as a concert, but it became a celebration. In between numbers, Scorsese chats to members of The Band, filmed by master DoPs Laszlo Kovacs and Vilmos Zsigmond. Scorsese’s message to the audience, “this film should be played loud” MT
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans traditional jazz musicians gather together to play and talk about the soul of their city which celebrates its 300th Anniversary in 2018.
An Evening With Beverly Luff Linn (Director: Jim Hosking,
Eighth Grade (Director/Screenwriter: Bo Burnham) – Thirteen-year-old Kayla endures the tidal wave of contemporary suburban adolescence as she makes her way through the last week of middle school — the end of her thus far disastrous eighth grade year — before she begins high school.
Generation Wealth (Director: Lauren Greenfield) – Lauren Greenfield’s postcard from the edge of the American Empire captures a portrait of a materialistic, image-obsessed culture. Simultaneously personal journey and historical essay, the film bears witness to the global boom–bust economy, the corrupted American Dream and the human costs of late stage capitalism, narcissism and greed.
Half the Picture (Director: Amy Adrion) – At a pivotal moment for gender equality in Hollywood, successful women directors tell the stories of their art, lives and careers. Having endured a long history of systemic discrimination, women filmmakers may be getting the first glimpse of a future that values their voices equally.
Hereditary (Director/Screenwriter: Ari Aster) – After their reclusive grandmother passes away, the Graham family tries to escape the dark fate they’ve inherited.
Leave No Trace (Director: Debra Granik, Screenwriters: Debra Granik, Anne Rosellini) – A father and daughter live a perfect but mysterious existence in Forest Park, a beautiful nature reserve near Portland, Oregon, rarely making contact with the world. A small mistake tips them off to authorities sending them on an increasingly erratic journey in search of a place to call their own.
The Miseducation of Cameron Post (Director: Desiree Akhavan, Screenwriters: Desiree Akhavan, Cecilia Frugiuele) –1993: after being caught having sex with the prom queen, a girl is forced into a gay conversion therapy center. Based on Emily Danforth’s acclaimed and controversial coming-of-age novel.
Never Goin’ Back (Director/Screenwriter: Augustine Frizzell) –Jessie and Angela, high school dropout BFFs, are taking a week off to chill at the beach. Too bad their house got robbed, rent’s due, they’re about to get fired and they’re broke. Now they’ve gotta avoid eviction, stay out of jail and get to the beach, no matter what!!!
Skate Kitchen (Director: Crystal Moselle, Screenwriters: Crystal Moselle, Ashlihan Unaldi) – Camille’s life as a lonely suburban teenager changes dramatically when she befriends a group of girl skateboarders. As she journeys deeper into this raw New York City subculture, she begins to understand the true meaning of friendship as well as her inner self.
The Tale (Director/Screenwriter: Jennifer Fox) – An investigation into one woman’s memory as she’s forced to re-examine her first sexual relationship and the stories we tell ourselves in order to survive; based on the filmmaker’s own story.
Yardie (Director: Idris Elba, Screenwriters: Brock Norman Brock, Martin Stellman) – Jamaica, 1973. When a young boy witnesses his brother’s assassination, a powerful Don gives him a home. Ten years later he is sent on a mission to London. He reunites with his girlfriend and their daughter, but then the past catches up with them. Based on Victor Headley’s novel.































